There is a better alternative to
what I have just suggested, viz. that the 6 extra hau tea
glyphs at the end of side b correspond to waxing moon. The
Spring Sun time has no corresponding hau tea glyphs on
side b (according to my reading of the text), therefore a sense
of balance proposes that the 'spring' moon time (presumably not
documented on side a), i.e. Waxing Moon, is worthy of a place on
side b.
Spring Sun: |
|
|
|
|
Aa1-5 |
Aa1-6 |
Aa1-7 |
Aa1-8 |
|
|
|
|
Aa1-19 |
Aa1-21 |
Aa1-23 |
Aa1-27 |
|
|
|
|
Aa4-43 |
Aa4-46 |
Aa4-54 |
Aa4-70 |
Waxing Moon: |
|
|
|
|
Ab5-8 |
Ab6-23 |
Ab6-71 |
Ab7-64 |
Here we must notice
that Ab6-71 has a black 'eye', while Ab7-64 has an extraordinary
big white 'eye'. I guess we here see an announcement of the
reversal at midsummer - black going away and white taking over.
We should remember the similar message in Aa4-58 and Aa4-60:
Monday affirms (in
Hb9-23 and Hb9-25) that black is coming first:
There remains two glyphs, however:
|
|
Ab8-48 |
Ab8-53 |
14 |
15 |
Possibly Ab8-53
should be regarded as 'belonging' to side a, which would create
a balance between 4 Waxing Moon glyphs + 1 extra for the moon + 1
extra for the sun + 4 Spring Sun glyphs.
Ab8-48 is similar to
Aa5-5 and Aa5-63 in showing a steep slope upwards:
Ab8-53 has the
middle vertical line shortest, a feature shared only with
Ab4-49:
To investigate which of the two
suggested solutions - for explaining the appearance of 6 extra hau tea
after Ab4-79 - is supported by the
Tahua text, I think we should compare the
distribution of the internal parallel glyph sequences (all of
which are found on the opposite side, none on the same side).
We begin with the text on side b.
The first parallel appears at Ab1-14--20:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ab1-14 |
Ab1-15 |
Ab1-16 |
Ab1-17 |
Ab1-18 |
Ab1-19 |
Ab1-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aa4-12 |
Aa4-13 |
Aa4-14 |
Aa4-15 |
Aa4-16 |
Aa4-17 |
Aa4-18 |
Although the order
and the signs vary it is evident that these 7 glyphs are
'mirrored' on the opposite side of the tablet.
We have seen that
side b starts with an apparent number pattern: 7, 6, 7 and the
sum of these is 20. It is as yet unclear whether the 7, 6, 7
pattern is reflected also in the 13 glyphs before Aa4-12.
In Ab1-15 we
recognize the boat of the sun from Aa1-2:
Most interesting is that in Large
Washington Tablet we can see the same kind of presentation as in
Ab1-14--16:
|
|
|
Sb2-32 |
Sb2-33 |
Sb2-34 |
|
|
|
Ab1-14 |
Ab1-15 |
Ab1-16 |
The messages
certainly are not identical, though, as can be seen by the signs:
4 + 4 in Sb2-33 but 4 + 1 + 4 in Ab1-15, the boat in Ab1-15
separate but not so in Sb2-33 etc.
We have earlier met
these glyphs in Large Washington Tablet as part of a presumed
yearly calendar:
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
Sb2-2 |
Sb2-3 |
Sb2-4 |
Sb2-17 |
Sb2-18 |
Sb2-19 |
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
Sb2-5 |
Sb2-6 |
Sb2-7 |
Sb2-20 |
Sb2-21 |
Sb2-22 |
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
Sb2-8 |
Sb2-9 |
Sb2-10 |
Sb2-23 |
Sb2-24 |
Sb2-25 |
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
Sb2-11 |
Sb2-12 |
Sb2-13 |
Sb2-26 |
Sb2-27 |
Sb2-28 |
5 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
Sb2-14 |
Sb2-15 |
Sb2-16 |
Sb2-29 |
Sb2-30 |
Sb2-31 |
I have here
red-painted obviously marked glyphs. To begin with Sb2-7, I earlier
remarked:
It should be noticed that this
glyph and Sb2-1 are of another sort than the rest:
|
|
Sb2-1 and Sb2-7 |
the rest of the periods |
I think that e.g.
Aa7-72 also belong to this special type of
glyph:
|
Aa7-72 |
Significantly
Aa7-72 is also located in association with
what I believe to be a calender of the year.
|
Sb2-1 appears
earlier in a possible 'period zero', which due to destroyed glyphs at the
end of line b1 is unclear:
|
|
|
... |
|
|
|
|
Sb1-115 |
Sb1-116 |
Sb1-117 |
Sb2-1 |
Sb2-2 |
Sb2-3 |
Sb2-4 |
? |
0 |
1 |
Also the end of line
b2 (beyond Sb2-34) is destroyed, otherwise we could have
determined whether Sb2-1 is the end of a missing period 0 or if
alternatively we should read Sb2-1 as the first glyph in a
series of triads, each one ending with a variant of the sun.
In
the latter case we maybe should regard the 4th glyph in order
below as the first one in a following 4-glyph sequence. I
believe that is the correct reading - i.e. no part of line b1
ever had a part in the calendar.
|
|
|
|
Sb2-31 |
Sb2-32 |
Sb2-33 |
Sb2-34 |
|
|
|
|
Ab1-10 |
Ab1-14 |
Ab1-15 |
Ab1-16 |
|
|
|
|
Aa4-3 |
Aa4-13 |
Aa4-14 |
Aa4-15 |
The '11th' sun is
Sb2-33, newborn and equal to the 1st sun in a canoe surrounded
by darkness. Then it becomes obvious that Sb2-34 (GD28) belongs
to the '11th' sun - because we know that GD28 signifies
darkness.
Ab1-10 is 4
glyphs away, not arriving immediately before Ab1-14.
Similarly Aa4-3 appears 10 glyphs ahead of Aa4-13. The distance
between the two marked GD45 (ihe tau) in S is 6 glyphs.
I earlier pointed at
Aa7-72 as not only being marked but furthermore 'significantly
... also located in association with what I believe to be a
calender of the year'. The calendar is the one which is found on
Level 5 - while the Large Santiago calendar (which we are discussing)
is located on Level 4.
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aa7-70 |
Aa7-71 |
Aa7-72 |
Aa7-73 |
Aa7-74 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aa7-75 |
Aa7-76 |
Aa7-77 |
Aa7-78 |
Aa7-79 |
|
|
|
|
|
Aa7-80 |
Aa7-81 |
Aa7-82 |
Aa7-83 |
Aa7-84 |
|
|
Not only Aa7-72 is
marked, but we can see that Aa7-81 has been 'nicked' and we have
Aa7-79 (probably Matariki) in this
8th and final period of the calendar. |
Aa7-85 |
Aa8-1 |
We probably now should reread the
structured table of 'uncomplicated' GD45 glyphs in Tahua:
- |
|
Fat, open at bottom left, a hint of a spur at bottom
right. |
1 |
6 |
10 |
Aa1-12 |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
Aa1-49 |
Aa1-50 |
Aa1-51 |
Aa3-74 |
Aa4-3 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Red
labels for
marked
glyphs. |
4 |
Aa4-48 |
Aa4-51 |
Aa4-66 |
Aa4-75 |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
10 |
Aa5-46 |
Aa5-54 |
Aa5-57 |
Aa5-64 |
Aa5-83 |
Aa6-41 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Aa4-75 and Ab2-7 belong to this group. |
4 |
Aa7-19 |
Aa7-26 |
Aa7-36 |
Aa7-48 |
- |
|
|
A variant in between 3 and 5. |
2 |
6 |
Aa7-57 |
Aa7-68 |
- |
|
|
|
|
10 + 10 + 6 = 26 = 15 +
11 |
4 |
Aa7-72 |
Aa7-81 |
Aa8-23 |
Ab1-10 |
3 |
|
The 6th and last glyph of this kind (3). |
1 |
5 |
18 |
Ab2-7 |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Open at top. |
4 |
Ab2-31 |
Ab2-51 |
Ab2-68 |
Ab3-3 |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
Ab4-11 |
Ab5-12 |
Ab5-36 |
Ab5-38 |
Ab5-40 |
Ab6-85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ab7-13 |
Ab7-18 |
Ab7-20 |
Ab8-44 |
Ab8-66 |
Ab8-68 |
|
Variant 5 has
1
+ 12 = 13 glyphs, reminding us about 13 * 28 = 364.
26 + 18 (= ½*36) = 44. |
Ab8-78 |
Indeed, Aa7-72,
together with Aa1-12, are heavily marked. They could be parallel in
time, marking the close and new beginning of the great period, the year.
I count glyphs and
find the distance between Aa1-12 and Aa7-72 to be 560 glyphs, and
the distance the other way to be 1,334 - 560 = 774 glyphs.
560 = 20 * 28
774 = 6 * 129 = 18 *
43 - or maybe (7 + 7) * 4 =
56
Although 20 * 28 is good, the other
measure, 774, leaves me cold. I feel exhausted and is ready to
give up, when I suddenly realize that Aa7-81 is a mirror image
of Aa1-12:
|
|
Aa1-12 |
Aa7-81 |
Aa1-12 is fat, while
Aa7-81 is lean. However, they share a common trait (which none
of the 42 other glyphs have): they are open at the bottom.
Aa1-12 is open at left and Aa7-81 at ríght. Presumably this
means that at the left of Aa1-12 there is darkness, while the
darkness is to the right of Aa7-81.
To the left of
Aa1-12 we have the 'death' of the sun at Aa1-11, but also - a
little earlier - the end of side b. To the right of Aa7-81 we
find:
|
|
Aa7-82 |
Aa7-83 |
6 feathers in
maro (in Aa7-83) should mean 'sun is ending'. Aa7-82 is the
3rd of the
12 main henua, maybe marking autumn equinox:
|
|
|
|
4 on side a and 8 on side b. |
Aa1-43 |
Aa4-38 |
Aa7-82 |
Aa8-84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ab1-62 |
Ab1-77 |
Ab2-1 |
Ab2-18 |
Ab2-47 |
Ab6-78 |
Ab6-80 |
Ab8-35 |
Aa1-12 is like alfa
(α) and Aa7-82 is like omega (ω).
I am struck by the
similarity in form and function between ω and viri.
I count the glyphs between
Aa1-12 and Aa7-82 and reach 570 (of course, because Aa7-82 is 10
glyphs ahead of Aa7-72). Another alternative is to count also
the 'alfa' and 'omega' glyphs, in which case we get 572.
1,334 - 570 = 764
1,334 - 572 = 762
570 = 10 * 57 while 764 =
4 * 191
572 = 11 * 52 while 762 =
6 * 127
Neither result is
acceptable, and counting the ordinary way 'from - to' leads to
odd numbers: 571 (a prime) and 763 = 7 * 109.
Probably it is not meant that we should
count GD45 distances by way of Aa1-12 and Aa7-82 (and neither by
way of Aa1-12 and Aa7-72).
All this counting has, however,
lead me to the correct solution (to a problem which - it may be
argued - is only located in my own head):
If we count by way of Aa1-12 (the
1st GD45 glyph on side a) and Ab1-10 (the 1st GD45 glyph on side
b) we hit jackpot: They lie equidistant from each other.
Half the way through 1,334 glyphs
we have 667 glyphs, but that is an odd number. 668 glyphs is
better and that is the distance from Aa1-12 to Ab1-10:
a1 |
90 |
b1 |
82 |
Aa1-12 |
a1:
90-12 |
a2 |
85 |
b2 |
85 |
|
a2: 85 |
a3 |
76 |
b3 |
77 |
a3: 76 |
a4 |
82 |
b4 |
80 |
a4: 82 |
a5 |
83 |
b5 |
80 |
a5: 83 |
a6 |
84 |
b6 |
92 |
a6: 84 |
a7 |
85 |
b7 |
84 |
a7: 85 |
a8 |
85 |
b8 |
84 |
a8: 85 |
sum |
670 |
sum |
664 |
b1: 10 |
|
Ab1-10 |
sum 668 |
667 would be the
result if we had counted between Aa1-12 and Ab1-10, an obviously
wrong procedure because 667 is an odd number. Equally bad would
be to count including both end glyphs, reaching 669.
1,334 - 668 = 666
(the number of the beast)
I look up this
beast in Wikipedia:
"... The Beast is a
figure in the Book of Revelation, the last book of the New
Testament describing an elaborate metaphor. The Beast is an
animal with seven heads coming out of a sea who makes himself an
enemy of the Christian Church ..."
"...
The Number of the Beast is described in the Book
of Revelation 13:18. From the King James
translation:
|
Here is wisdom. Let
him that hath understanding count the
number of the beast: for it is the
number of a man; and his number is Six
hundred threescore and six. |
"...
666 is an abundant number. It is the sum of the
first 36 natural numbers (i.e.
1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 34 + 35
+ 36 = 666), and thus a triangular
number. Since 36 is both square and triangular,
666 is the sixth number of the form
n2(n2
+ 1) / 2 ...and the eighth number
of the form n(n
+ 1)(n2 + n + 2) / 8
...
... 666
is the sum of the squares of the first seven
prime numbers (i.e. 22
+ 32 + 52 + 72
+ 112 + 132 + 172
= 666).
... The
Roman numeral representation of the number 666
(DCLXVI) uses once each the Roman numeral
symbols with values under 1,000, occurring in
descending order of their respective values (D =
500, C = 100, L = 50, X = 10, V = 5, I = 1) ..."
For Tahua I suggest the interpretation
of 666 as symbolizing 3 repetitions of the solar
double-month, magically imprinting the dark side b with the
mark of the sun. Sun is the generator of light and order. What
better number could be chosen than 666?
But it may all be in my
imagination.