TRANSLATIONS
Next page (from the link labelled '314'):
Here I earlier committed a curious mistake, counting Hb3-6 not as glyph number 99 + 6 = 105 (on side b) but as glyph number 156:
How did I arrive at 156? Presumably by thinking 150 + 6 = 156. But where did I get 150, then? Presumably by writing 150 instead of 250. Mistakes come by way of the subconscious. Here it played a trick on me. Probably my subconscious has here told me that there is another way to count, at least equally good as the one I was consciously trying out. Glyph number 1155 (tao at Hb10-33) is really correctly counted from Ha1-4. By adding 3 * 64 = 192 we can recalibrate after manu rere in Thursday:
|