TRANSLATIONS

next page previous page up home
 

According to the pictures in Barthel side a of H is damaged in two places, while side b is depicted as intact:

On the other hand, the pictures of the text indicate damages also in four of the lines on side b (blackmarked below):

a1 50 50 b1 *51 (?) 51
a2 58 108 b2 48 99
a3 52 160 b3 47 146
a4 56 216 b4 51 197
a5 59 275 b5 57 254
a6 *69? 344 b6 54 308
a7 *51? 395 b7 50 358
a8 *54? 449 b8 *54 (?) 412
a9 *53? 502 b9 65 477
a10 *67? 569 b10 67 544
a11 *58? 627 b11 53 597
a12 *21? 648 b12 *51? 648
sum *648? sum *648?

The glyph at the beginning of line Hb11 is marked as damaged by Barthel, but it is partly seen in Fischer, and the number of glyphs in this line is therefore certainly (and presumably significantly) 53:

glyph numbers are counted from Ha1-4
Hb10-67 Hb11-1 (1190) Hb11-2
1191 / 3 + 64 = 461 = 261 (= 9 * 29) + 200

The number of glyphs in line b8 can be said to be 54 + 0, meaning that one of the glyphs is marked as missing both according to Barthel and Fischer, not engraved where it is expected:

glyph numbers are counted from Ha1-4
...
Hb8-15 *Hb8-16 *Hb8-17 *Hb8-18 (1021) *Hb8-19 *Hb8-20
340 + 64 = 404 405

Certainly the engraver has left the position 'open' for some reason. The parallel text of P supports this view, because the glyph is an extraordinary one, a pito:

Pb9-32 Pb9-33 (1025) Pb9-34 Pb9-35 Pb9-36 Pb9-37

I think the open position in H should not be counted, it is 'in the dark' (like the blackened parts of side a). Glyph line Hb1 seems to be of the same kind as Ha6-Ha12, blackend by fire. On side b then remains only line Hb12, a special case, because Barthel and Fischer have left out one glyph position at the end of the line, but I think (for numerical reasons) we should count two:

glyph numbers are counted from Ha1-4
Hb12-40 Hb12-41 Hb12-42 (1284) Hb12-43 Hb12-44 Hb12-45
428 + 64 = 492 493
...
Hb12-46 Hb12-47 Hb12-48 Hb12-49 *Hb12-50 (1292) *Hb12-51
494 495

Uncertainty rules here, because 648 glyphs on side b can be accomplished either by having 2 'lost' glyphs at the end of the text (as above) or by having a single glyph beyond Hb12-49 (where 7 * 7 = 49) and instead counting with 1 glyph also at the vacant place of pito (between Hb8-15and -16).

The text on side b cannot stop at 1292, that would be unlucky. There must be 'one more'. Also, 12 * 50 = 600.

495 = 5 * 99 (as if alluding to the 5-fold star of Venus), and 495 + 1 = 496 = 16 * 31 (= 432 + 64).

That was a discussion of side b. But we need to consider side a, where so much damage has more or less destroyed (it seems) many glyph lines (also including Hb1).

The destruction from fire, resulting in blackened wood, possibly was there already before the writer started with his work, I have guessed.

According to the picture of side a in Barthel there is also a damage between lines a5 and a6. Fischer: "... on line 6 of the recto there is one deep black gash and one small knot-hole ...":

 

glyph numbers are counted from Ha1-4
... ... ...
Ha6-17 Ha6-18 Ha6-19 *Ha6-20 *Ha6-21 *Ha6-22
361 362
... ...
*Ha6-23 *Ha6-24 *Ha6-25 *Ha6-26 *Ha6-27 *Ha6-28 (300)
363 300 / 3 + 64 = 364

The end of the day is changing into the end of the solar year (either counted as 300 or as 364 days long). Darkness is falling in both cases, and the deep black gash has been used optimally, I think. A renewal in the text flow - and in time - then comes with Rei in the center of day 366, when life is returning (beyond the 'crack'):

 

*Ha6-29 *Ha6-30 *Ha6-31 *Ha6-32 *Ha6-33 *Ha6-34
365 366