The structure of K, the shortest of the texts we have on our table, is slowly becoming more and more clear. The mirror parallel in C forced us to define the end of the K text:

168 = 6 * 28
	Ca6-28	Kb4-15
177 = 6 * 29.5
	Ca7-9	Kb5-5
182 = 7 * 26
	Ca7-14	Kb5-10
192 = 6 * 32 = 8 * 24
	Ca7-24	Kb5-20

We had better document this clearly:

Kb4-15	Kb4-16	Kb4-17	Kb4-18	Kb4-19
168 = 6 * 28 = 8 * 21	169	170	171	172
...
*Kb5-1	*Kb5-2	*Kb5-3	*Kb5-4	*Kb5-5
*173	*174 = 6 * 29	*175	*176 = 8 * 22	*177 = 6 * 29.5
		...
*Kb5-6	*Kb5-7	*Kb5-8	*Kb5-9	*Kb5-10
*178	*179	*180 = 6 * 30	*181	*182 = 7 * 26
...
*Kb5-11	*Kb5-12	*Kb5-13	*Kb5-14	*Kb5-15
*183	*184 = 8 * 23	*185	*186 = 6 * 31	*187
*Kb5-16	*Kb5-17	*Kb5-18	*Kb5-19	*Kb5-20
*188	*189	*190	*191	*192 = 8 * 24 = 6 * 32

I have added Kb5-14 in order to connect it to Ca7-14, which we have found to be reasonable. But Ca7-14 has number 182, which connects it also to Kb5-10. In C number 182 can be explained as 13 * 14, with moon (7) involved. In K number 182 is not equally relevant. Kb5-5 (6 * 29.5, 177, Nga Kope Ririva) shows a 'moon' type of henua, while Kb5-10 has the normal type of henua. In Kb5-2 the henua sign is understandable - it is defined by using 6 (174 = 6 * 29). Not so at Kb5-10. 182 / 6 = 30⅓. But the glyph has ordinal number 10 counted from the strait of the sharks:

...
*Kb5-1	*Kb5-2	*Kb5-3	*Kb5-4	*Kb5-5
		...
*Kb5-6	*Kb5-7	*Kb5-8	*Kb5-9	*Kb5-10
...
*Kb5-11	*Kb5-12	*Kb5-13	*Kb5-14	*Kb5-15
*Kb5-16	*Kb5-17	*Kb5-18	*Kb5-19	*Kb5-20

Kb5-12 (5 * 12 = 60) has number 8 * 23, which seems to connect it to the last glyph, Kb5-20 (5 * 20 = 100) which has ordinal number 8 * 24. Going backwards we then find 8 * 22 = 176 to be Kb5-4 (5 * 4 = 20), and 8 * 21 = 168 at Kb4-15 (4 * 15 = 90).

Summarizing:

168	6 * 28	8 * 21
174	6 * 29
176	6 * 29⅓	8 * 22
177	6 * 29.5
182	6 * 30⅓
184	6 * 30⅔	8 * 23
186	6 * 31
192	6 * 32	8 * 24