TRANSLATIONS
As I remember it my impressions already from the beginning was that side a was the side of sun light, and side b the side of the night. (I refer to Tahua.) When Metoro began his reading on side b instead of side a, I could accept that because light was not there (in cosmos) from the beginning. I have now become convinced Metoro was right. With the (probably) mythological marker glyphs Aa4-18 and Aa6-66 we can guess the main parts of the cycle, and the two viri on side b says where the beginning is:
The length of the text and the exercises searching for kuhane stations later made me believe there were 2 glyphs for each day. Now I have modified my view and would rather say that when the long cycle around both sides is interpreted the rule of 2 glyphs per day seems reasonable, but when tracing the shorter cycle around only side a one glyph per day could be the right way to read. First, the discovery of ki uta ki te pito o te henua at position 290 (counted from Aa1-1) makes sense if we think of 10 months with 29 days in each - it could be the measure of a calendar where sun has reached his end at day 290:
Then, another sequence of glyphs makes better sense with 1 glyph per day than 2:
390 - 90 (Aa1-1--90) = 300 seems to be the measure of the sun based on 10 months with 30 days in each:
25 = 5 * 5 (at 250) indicates 'fire', which surely must be the sun. If a calendar is beginning at Aa1-1 with day number 1, and if sun will leave at day 390, then there should be 30 days (counted from Aa1-1) which in some meaning belong to the previous year. Because 390 - 30 = 360. Aa1-30 could be the last glyph of the previous year:
There follow 6 more glyphs before the daylight calendar ends. 360 + 6 = 366. Flexibility is embedded. The peculiar Aa1-35 can be explained by the two years meeting on day 365. There are 670 glyphs on side a, and 390 have been (partially) explained. 670 - 390 = 280 = 10 months measured by nights when moon potentially is visible. But no obvious trace is found of such a structure:
|