A few preliminary
remarks and imaginations:
1.
These are the tagata rere glyphs in G:
|
|
|
Ga1-7 |
Ga1-9 |
Ga7-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gb5-7 |
Gb5-8 |
Gb5-9 |
Gb5-11 |
Gb5-26 |
The first three of them look more as 'true' tagata rere
than the following 5, I think; looking straight at us and birdlike in appearance. Maybe
tagata rere means bird man?
The wings of tagata rere are shorter than those of manu
rere:
|
|
tagata rere |
manu rere |
I imagine tagata rere hardly could
fly. If tagata rere represents some kind of bird it must
be a moa rather than a manu.
Interestingly, Metoro never mentioned moa at any of
the total of 58 tagata rere glyphs he had opportunity
to comment upon. There ought to be some intrinsic opposition
between tagata rere and moa.
Possibly Metoro from the surrounding glyphs
deduced that the tagata rere glyphs he encounterd could not
be moa. But if so, then tagata rere glyphs must
occur only at distinct special occasions.
Another, and more plausible, possibility is that moa always must
be seen with the upper part of their torso turned toward us - with
two wings, kara, in view instead of one:
|
|
|
|
|
|
manu rere |
moe |
tagata rere |
kara etahi |
vae kore |
moa |
|