TRANSLATIONS
We should complete the excursion into how many glyphs there are in H. We left the question here:
By using 7 + 6 + 7 (+ 6) as a pattern to look for we may be able to eliminate ?-marks. We begin with b1:
There are however remains of ca 6 more glyphs in the destroyed area:
The difference in number of glyphs between P and Q (in the parallel area) is due to Pb3-14:
Working with the 24 glyphs we must observe a 7-glyph parallel in B, from the beginning of line Qb4:
We have, then, 6 glyphs from the beginning of line Hb1 which are parallel in appearance and number with what we see in P and Q:
Then follows destroyed glyphs in H, where P has 6 and Q 8 glyphs:
In the next phase there are 7 glyphs in parallel (B, P, Q) while H still is unreadable:
And at the end of the destroyed area in H we have a sequence with 3 glyphs in the parallel P and Q texts:
Summary:
The difference between 24 (a cosmic number) in Q and 22 (unacceptable) in P is explained if we look at the beginning of line Pb3, where the missing 2 glyphs are found:
H has no text in parallel with Pb2-35--Pb3-2. The text which in P and Q precedes Hb1-1 seems to be connected by way of Pb3-1--2 to the following text (also is found in H). To reach 24 also in H, we must assume a parallel number of glyph as in Q. Therefore, there should be 52 and not 51 glyphs in line Hb1. Sorting according to the pattern 7 + 6 etc we get:
However, considering the 7-glyph sequence with parallel in B (red-marked below) another pattern must rule:
The goal was not 24, it was - you could say - 14 (= 7 + 7), followed by 6 + te pito. Therefore, depending on how many glyphs there were in parallel with Qb4-8--9 (respectively with Pb3-22--23), there could have been just one glyph in H - i.e. the number for Hb1 may have been 51 (or 52). The question mark is not eliminated. |