TRANSLATIONS
Next page:
Once again my suspicion creeps out of his hole: What is really there and what is a fabric of my mind? I think much evidence must be gathered before any definite viewpoints can be established - especially if they are only numeric in character. Moreover, and more important, data must be put in perspective - be related to other data. Otherwise they cannot be converted into hard 'facts'. The link '3rd viri' leads to the following page:
Kb1-14 and Kb4-6 possibly are related to the 2nd Rei (Ka3-15). There are 3 Rei and 3 viri:
Maybe Rei glyphs mark the beginning of seasons in the light and viri the end of seasons in the dark. There are no viri glyphs between the 1st and 3rd Rei. The 'domain of Rei' - from Ka2-10 up to and including Kb1-11 - measures (60 - 33) + 51 = 78 glyphs, not an impossible number (6 * 13 = 78). 192 - 78 = 114 = 6 * 19 would be the remainder (outside the 'domain of Rei). Kb1-14 cannot really mark 'the end of a season in the dark', not if Kb1-11 announces 'the beginning of a season in the light'. The space between the 2nd Rei and the 2nd viri is quite too short. Maybe the 1st Rei indicates the beginning of the light season and the 3rd Rei the end of the light season? (60 - 33) + 51 = 78 = 6 * 13 for the light season and 192 - 78 = 114 = 6 * 19 for the dark season. If 19 indicates how sun has 'gone into shadow' then 13 will indicate his presence. 19 - 13 = 6. What about the 2nd Rei?
The 2nd Rei presumably is the most important because of its central position. Likewise, Kb4-6 should be regarded as central, and therefore their distance (99) will be important too. Ka5-13 is the 36th glyph from the 2nd Rei, and then a new sequence begins with the 'dark' Rei at Ka5-14. Halfway to Ka5-13 we have Ka4-12, a glyph which is 'spooky' because the feet are absent and the leg ends open: |