TRANSLATIONS

next page previous page up home

The triplet of rhombs, as for instance in Aa1-78 and Aa1-84:

  

maybe means those 3 quarters when sun is present. If so, then they may stand for 3 * 91 = 273 days.

Metoro's standard inoino at this type of glyph ('Ce qui est éclarante, rayonnant' according to Jaussen.) could then be explained as 'what is bathing in the rays from the sun'.

We must consider once again some of the earlier thoughts as condensed in the glyph dictionary:

Ab6-88:

Here the 'balls' are changed into rhombs, meaning three lunar double-months. Wheareas the solar double-months have 2 * 30 = 60 days, the lunar double-months have 30 + 29 = 59 nights.

There is no vertical straight line in the middle of the glyph. 59 is an odd number and cannot be divided into twins. Also there is no measurement, the moon is a 'clock' in itself.

The four corners in the rhomb marks where periods of 14 nights are completed. 4 * 14 = 56 = the number of nights in a two-month period when the moon is visible.

In a rhomb the 14 nights when the moon is waxing may be seen as the upwards going line at left, the apex being the time of full moon. The waning moon will then be represented by the downwards sloping line at right. At the time of new moon we turn the rhomb 180º similar to when we start to read a rongorongo tablet (though here clockwise instead of counter-clockwise), and after that we can start once again with the waxing moon of the new month.

Moon and sun are complementary. And the texts on the rongorongo tablets turn counter-clockwise only every odd turn, the even turns are clockwise. Right and left alternate, just like sun and moon. The sun is right, the moon is left.

The counter-clockwise movement seems to be connected with the sun (south of the equator) and the clockwise movement therefore with the moon. Consequently, the waning moon should be the downwards sloping line at right.

"The 'second list of place names' appears for the first time in Ms. E. The sequence of the places named runs opposite to Hau Maka's 'first list of place names'. Commencing on land at a point 'that can send signals' out to sea, the path turns to the right along the coastline so that the ocean is always on the left.

On the other hand, proceeding from the land of origin with the description of the route to the new land, Hau Maka's place names are intended to provide a route that starts from the ocean and along which the ocean is always to the right.

We seem to be dealing here with two possible inversions; turning 'toward the sea' vs. turning 'toward the land', while maintaining the same general direction, which is described by the common Polynesian contrast pair tai vs. uta, or turning 'toward the right' vs. turning 'toward the left', facing in the same direction at the start." (Barthel 2)

The 'first list of place names' (sun) seems to have been handed down in writing, the 'second list of place names' (moon) presumably was passed on with kaikai:

"While the 'first list of place names' is supposed to have been handed down explicitly in writing (ta ki runga ki te kaka), the 'second list of place names' was passed on with the aid of a mnemonic device in the form of recitations (patautau) accompanied by the string-figures (kaikai)." (Barthel 2)

Addendum:

Let us reason the other way around: 84 divided by 3 equals 28 (the number of nights in a month when moon is visible). 14 is twice the weekly number, and 28 = 2 * 14. A rhomb may therefore be understood as the period when moon is shining on the earth. Each side of the rhomb marks a week (not a fortnight which I earlier suggested).

Metoro's reaction to this type of glyph (inoino, bad-bad) maybe was because after 84 nights there was needed 6 nights intercalated to reach the sun triple-month period 90 days, a period corresponding to the time for moving from one of the 4 cardinal points (solstices and equinoxes) to the next. Still the standard GD53 with ovals may continue to mean 6 solar months:

However, another solution is to see 3 solar months and an additional day (the vertical straight line) to reach 91 days. Instead of reading 3 solar double-months we may read 3 single solar months + 1 additional day. We now reach a kind of symmetry between the two glyph types:

  

They both mean a quarter, but the triplet of rhombs measures 3 * 28 = 84 days, whereas the triplet of balls measures 3 * 30 + 1 = 91 days. The difference is a week (7 days). We may then imagine a greater rhomb measuring the whole year (364 days). At each corner of this rhomb we have an extra week, while each side of the rhomb measures 84 days. 4 * (84 + 7) = 364

The solar year, on the other hand, is divided in two halves, with 2 * 91 = 182 days in each half. Such a half could be represented by a double GD53, as e.g. in Aa7-9--10:

Maybe the same sign was used to indicate the Pleiades. One half of the year they are 'above' and the other half of the year they are 'below'. I think this reading of the glyphs is better than what I suggested earlier.

4 quarters à 91 days equals 364 days for a year, followed by a 'leap' day. That seems to be a good point from which to start the reasoning.

3 quarters are enlightened by the sun, 1 quarter is not. Also that seems to be a  reasonable assumption.

The origin of the current line of investigation was Ab7-1:

... Maybe Ab7-1 depicts the year. 3 + 1 would then, probably, mean 3 regular quarters + 1 odd quarter (when sun is absent). In the beginning and at the end of the year sun is absent. 3 regular quarters could be the 3 'wives' of the sun.

Given that the year has 364 nights, a quarter has 91 nights. 2 quarters makes 182 nights or half a year. A rhomb could then stand for such a half-year. But we mostly find 3 rhombs in a vertical row, which then would mean 3 half-years, i.e. 3 * 182 = 546 nights. What is the meaning of that? I have a faint recollection that the Chinese counted with 1½ year periods. 3 wives of the sun maybe explains why we find a triplet of half-years?

182 = 13 * 14, i.e. 546 = 13 * 42. Is this fact the reason why we find 42 so often?

546 = 6 * 7 * 13. 26 = 6 + 7 + 13. The possibilities are many ...

Though there are no hatchmarks incised on the two end half-triangles.

A rhomb may stand for a period when the sun is showering the earth with his light rays. Therefore a rhomb may mean 28 nights and the triple rhomb constellation 84 nights.

Alternatively, a rhomb may mean 3 * 28 = 84 nights, i.e. the triple rhombs would equal 3 * 84 = 252 nights. 252 = 14 * 18 and 84 = 14 * 6.

A third possibility is that a rhomb means 56 nights (because that is the number of nights during a lunar double month when sun 'sees' the moon). The triplet of rhombs then becomes 3 * 56 = 168 = 14 * 12.

I think the basic idea of a correspondence in structure between the triple rhombs and the triple balls should be assumed.

The Pleiades (tau ono) probably are illustrated in the rongorongo texts by a double set of triple balls. The Belt of Orion (tau toru) therefore may be represented by a single set of triple balls.

The time when the Pleiades are absent may be the origin of the idea that sun is absent during a part of the year.

... In Nilsson's book I found many strange pieces of information, e.g.: 'Among the Nahyssan of S. Carolina time was measured and a rude chronology arranged by means of strings of leather with knots of various colour, like the Peruvian quipos. The Dakota use a circle as the symbol of time, a smaller one for a year and a larger one for a longer period: the circles are arranged in rows, thus: OOO or O-O-O. The Pima of Arizona make use of a tally. The year-mark is a deep notch across the stick...'

About the Ibo-speaking tribes' in Africa: ...they seem to be singularly incurious about heavenly bodies and occurrences; however names were got for the following constellations: - The Pleiades ('Hen and Chicken'), the belt of Orion ('Three and Three')... But Tautoru is the belt of Orion. 'Three and Three' is more like the Pleiades, Tauono. I guess that first was the belt of Orion named Tautoru and after that the Pleiades were named Tauono. Even the three great pyramids in Gizeh were connected with the belt of Orion, as shown by their locations in relation to each other on the ground.

The concept of two 'years', summer and winter, could then result in the belt of Orion being seen as a mark between those two 'years'. Moving then to the idea of three double months in each such 'year', they could identify the belt of Orion with a 'year'. And as the last step in this logic the Pleiades - about two thousand years later when the equinoxes had moved away from Orion - would have taken over the role of mark between the two half-years of three double-months ...

... 3 months from rise 'soon after sunset on November 20' the Pleiades are at the meridian 'at sunset' and then 'towards the end of April' - after another 2 months - they 'set in the rays of the setting Sun'. The movement of the Pleiades from the meridian to the west horizon takes an equal amount of time, I think, i.e. ¼ of the complete 12-month-cycle. But sun makes affirming observations impossible.

Anyhow, from 'the end of April' (when they disappear from view as if being burned to ashes by the Sun) until November 20 (ca 7 months) the Pleiades cannot be seen anywhere in the night sky (if the observation is done just after sundown) . If there were no sun disturbing the view, there would be ca 6 months visibility and ca 6 months invisibility. Sun destroys ca 1 month of the 'nika' period ...

... If both early evening and late night were used for the observations, the Pleiades could be seen in ca 11 months. During the 12th month (of invisibility) the Pleiades perhaps went through 'recycling' (death and rebirth). But 'nika' probably was defined as the time of visibility given a certain observation point (just after sunset or just before sunup) ...

... If we think of Tauono (the Pleiades) as having 'six stones' (tau-ono) and associate each stone with a 'season' corresponding to one month, then 6 could be understood as those 6 months when they in principle would be 'above' (in the night sky).

If we think of the Pleiades as having 7 'stars', that could instead mean those 7 'months' when it is not practically possible to see them. Perhaps 7 indicates 'Moon' (nighttime) because the little 'suns' in the Pleiades do not shine during 7 'months'? Maybe those 7 'months' are refleced in Aa7-14 etc:

Aa7-14

Aa7-20

Aa7-28

Aa7-42

Aa7-53

Aa7-63

Aa7-70

The Pleiades (or the Belt of Orion) should be watched for during the early or late  night. The balls are probably to be read as tau ('stones'), while the rhombs are to be understood as the 'square' earth bathing in the light from the sun, a daytime experience.

Ta'u, tau(tau)

Year (ta'u), he-hoa ite ta'u, to confess to a crime committed long ago, by publishing it in the form of a kohau motu mo rogorogo (rongorongo tablet). Vanaga.

1.To hang (tau), to perch  (said of chickens on tree branches at night);  rock on the coast, taller than others so that something can be deposited on it without fear of seeing washed it away by the waves; hakarere i ruga i te tau, to place something on such a rock; tau kupega, rope from which is hung the oval net used in ature fishing. 2. Pretty, lovely; ka-tau! how pretty! Vanaga.

1. Year, season, epoch, age. 2. Fit, worthy, deserving, opportune; tae tau, impolite, ill-bred, unseemly; pei ra tau, system. 3. To perch. 4. To hang; hakatau, necklace; hakatautau, to append. 5. Anchor; kona tau, anchorage, port. 6. To fight; hakatau, challenge, to defy, to incite; hakatautau, to rival. Churchill.

The Malay word for 'year' is taun or tahun. In all Polynesian dialects the primary sense is 'a season', 'a period of time'. In the Samoan group tau or tausanga, besides the primary sense of season, has the definite meaning of 'a period of six months', and conventionally that of 'a year', as on the island of Tonga. Here the word has the further sense of 'the produce of the year', and derivatively 'a year'. In the Society group it simply means 'season'. In the Hawaiian group, when not applied to the summer season, the word keeps its original sense of 'an indefinite period of time', 'a life-time, an age', and is never applied to the year: its duration may be more or less than a year, according to circumstances. So far our authority (Fornander, I, 124; cp. 119). It seems however to be questionable whether the original sense is not the concrete 'produce of the seasons', rather than the abstract 'period of time'. It is significant that on the Society Islands the bread-fruit season is called te tau, and the names of the other two seasons, te tau miti rahi and te tau poai, are formed by adding to this name. Nilsson.

At the risk of invoking the criticism, 'Astronomers rush in where philologists fear to tread', I should like to suggest that Taku-rua corresponds with the two-headed Roman god Janus who, on the first of January, looks back upon the old year with one head and forward to the new year with the other, and who is god of the threshold of the home as well as of the year... There is probably a play on words in takurua - it has been said that Polynesian phrases usually invoke a double meaning, a common and an esoteric one. Taku means 'slow', the 'back' of anything, 'rim' and 'command'. Rua is a 'pit', 'two' or 'double'. Hence takurua has been translated 'double command', 'double rim', and 'rim of the pit', by different authorities. Taku-pae is the Maori word for 'threshold'... Several Tuamotuan and Society Islands planet names begin with the word Takurua or Ta'urua which Henry translated Great Festivity and which is the name for the bright star Sirius in both New Zealand and Hawaii. The planet names, therefore, represent the final stage in the evolution of takurua which was probably first applied to the winter solstice, then to Sirius which is the most conspicious object in the evening sky of December and January, and was then finally employed for the brilliant and conspicious planets which outshone even the brightest star Sirius. From its association with the ceremonies of the new year and the winter solstice, takurua also aquired the meaning 'holiday' or 'festivity'. Makemson

The year was anciently two 'years' (half-years or periods somewhat shorter due to the invisibility of the Pleiades or other stars). Therefore taku-rua (ta'u-rua, tau-rua, two 'stones'), the foundation of the system of balls and rhombs.

Triple 'stones' with a 'notch' would be a good picture for the Belt of Orion, a marker for new year. The three islets outside Orongo would be connected with the Belt of Orion and with the beginning of a new year.

Triple rhombs would serve as the opposite side of the year, when sun ruled over the land. At night (winter) new year is inaugurated by admiring Orion (or the Pleiades), while the changing status of the sun is only to be seen in the daytime.

Is it possible to get any confirmation of these ideas from the glyphs in Tahua? Let us begin by listing all GD53 glyphs:

8 * 6 + 4 =  52 on side b (above) and 9 * 6 = 54 on side a (below)

Curiously we have 52 (= 4 * 13) glyphs on side b and 54 (= 3 * 18) on side a. Is this really coincidence? I have not (consciously) manipulated the numbers. There are 52 cards in a deck of cards, plus two Jokers.

Next, we delete the ball glyphs to isolate the rhomb glyphs:

5 * 6 =  30 on side b (top) and 8 on side a (bottom)

The number of rhomb glyphs (30 respectively 8) could suggest that the hypothesized link between rhombs and sun is a correct assumption.

  side b % side a %
rhomb glyphs 30 56 8 15
ball glyphs 24 44 44 85
sum 54 100 52 100

Unquestionably there is a message telling us about how on side a there are very few rhombs, a fact we should contrast with how we earlier have found side a to be 'in the light from the sun', while side be still is in the dark. But we must be more precise about the distribution of the rhomb glyphs. Are they located before or after the middle of respective side?

Ab2-45 Ab3-50 Ab5-7 Ab5-37 Ab5-39 Ab5-41
Ab5-48 Ab5-50 Ab5-52 Ab5-55 Ab5-58 Ab5-67
Ab5-68 Ab5-80 Ab6-2 Ab6-38 Ab6-39 Ab6-40
Ab6-66 Ab6-67 Ab6-69 Ab6-70 Ab6-72 Ab6-73
Ab6-74 Ab6-75 Ab6-88 Ab6-90 Ab7-27 Ab7-62
Aa1-78 Aa1-84 Aa2-45 Aa4-1 Aa4-69 Aa5-8
Redmarked glyphs are located in lines 1-4, the rest (blue) are in lines 5-8.
Aa6-82 Aa8-80

Rhomb glyphs (as a rule) are not located among the glyphs in the first half of respective side. A new table summarizes the exact figures:

number of rhomb glyphs
line no. side b side a line no. side b side a
1 - 2 5 12 1
2 1 1 6 14 1
3 1 - 7 2 -
4 - 2 8 - 1
sum 2 5 sum 28 3

The red-marked numbers (for the 2nd half of side b) do not look random and appear to be a result of the design of the creator.