If you now have taken the trouble to follow the trail I have made in the mentioned set of pages, you will perhaps have noticed that: 1) the number 29 appears three times and 2) the number 27 also appears three times. I don't know why. Surely there are more discoveries to make in due time. I am also dubious about 5a. It is too long (46 glyphs) for comfort. It ought, perhaps, be divided into 5a + a new set of 'a' + 'b' + 'c'. A typical number set for 'a' + 'b' + 'c' is 15 + 6 + 7 = 28 (or rather 27 or 29 cfr above). 29 + 15 = 44 which is not so far from 46. We have to look into that later, not now. These comments have established much anyhow. Time to stop here. |