|
Wíth 6 glyphs missing, the probable number of
glyphs on side b could reach 92 (20 + 18 + 18 +
18 + 18), in which case the total number on both
sides originally could have been 208 (116 + 92).
Maybe 208 could be explained as 4 * 52 (i.e.
similar to 4 * 91 = 364)?
52 = 4 * 13 and 91 = 7 * 13 and 4 * 7 = 28 and
208 = 2 vacant space 8 |
