Rb1-105
presumably corresponds not only to Qa8-33--36,
but also to Qa8-37. Perhaps Rb1-107 also belongs to
these 'parallel' glyphs of Q.
Qa8-31
Qa8-32
Qa8-33
Qa8-34
Qa8-35
Qa8-36
...
Several
glyphs at the end of Ra8 are missing and then nearly
half of those in Rb1. None are missing at the end of
Rb1 - the three dots mark that one or two glyphs are
missing at the beginning of Rb2.
Rb1-106
Rb1-107
Rb1-108
Rb1-109
Qa8-37 has a
form of hua which possibly might be explained by Rb1-106.
Cfr the corresponding glyph Qb3-101 which has the
standard form of hua:
On the
other hand Qa8-35 is also a possible explanation.
