TRANSLATIONS
I have been here before. The end of the 1st half year should be described in glyphs similar to the end of the 2nd half year. There is a waxing half and a waning half, two similar but yet very different entities. Therefore it is not necessary to explain the similarities between Gb5-2--3 and Ga7-24--25 as some sort of double accounting:
But Ga7-24--25 are not located halfway to Gb5-2--3. Twice 192 = 384, not 354. Gb4-33 is located at a kuhane station, Hatinga Te Kohe, and - we have seen - there are also other glyphs which follow and which can be regarded as marking points where seasons break:
Nga Kope Ririva at 177 = 6 * 29.5 maybe stretches halfway to 7 * 29.5, because 6.5 * 29.5 = 191.75 and Ga7-22 (192) would then be the beginning of next station:
If Nga Kope Ririva stretches 15 glyphs ahead from 177, then it would be strange if not also Hatinga Te Kohe would stretch 15 glyphs ahead from 354. But instead, I guess, Hatinga Te Kohe continues all through the glyph line b5 with 13 * 29.5 = 383.5 on the border between Gb5-29 and Gb6-1:
Therefore, we should assume that also Nga Kope Ririva continues beyond Ga7-21. If so, then for at least 10 more glyphs ahead:
Nga Kope Ririva is a place with Rei glyphs, a place where the new generation will form. In the glyph dictionary I wrote:
When multiplying the ordinal glyph numbers by 2 Nga Kope Ririva did not become 2 * 177 = 354 = 12 * 29.5 but it became 13 * 29.5 = 383.5 (384). Why? Te Kioe Uri was 59 (= 2 * 29.5), and 4 * 29.5 = 118. From Te Kioe Uri to Nga Kope Ririva there are 177 - 59 = 118 glyphs. If each glyph is counted as 2, then the distance becomes 118 * 2 = 236 and 118 + 236 = 354. The halfway point should be 118 + 118 = 236. I must have made a simple mistake, and I will correct it immediately now. |