Here we cannot find any clear parallel sequences of glyphs in the other texts, a marked change from what we have seen in the earlier sequences of glyphs.

On the other hand, there clearly is a continuation in the use of a kind of 'punctuation': What looks like a sitting person holding a rectangular object in his (or her) hands. In all there are 31 such 'ending' glyphs in G and 29 (or 28?) in K.

I have chosen to divide the text here so that we can see three of these 'subdivisions'. Adding those three to the three preceding we get 6 such subdivisions, i.e. on this page we see those subdivisions which could be numberd as 4, 5 and 6.

Possibly they belong together. They differ from those with nos. 1, 2 and 3 in not having parallels. But they are similar in this respect to those three on the next page (nos. 7, 8 and 9).

Probably we should regard those which I have numbered above from 4 to 9 as a group of six subdivisions of the text. For this group we can in G count to 6 * 5 = 30 marks on the 'thread' at right in the 'ending' glyphs. In K we can count to 20 such marks:

For contrast we can compare with the three preceding subdivisions (those with many parallel sequences of glyphs in other tablets):

And the subdivisions which follow (nos. 10 etc) have 6 marks (in the text of G), a sign that presumably means that the text from there should be regarded as 'different' in some way.