666 is the
number of the beast and we have found it in Tahua (cfr at
maitaki):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aa6-64 |
Aa6-65 |
Aa6-66 |
Aa6-67 |
Aa6-68 |
Aa6-69 |
Aa6-70 |
i to moa |
ko te vai hopu
o te moa |
e he goe kua moe |
ki to vaha o to
ika mea |
o te maitaki |
kua noho te
ariki |
e mago |
I have not listed
Aa6-67 as an example of hahe, but the top part does indeed
qualify as such. Instead I saw the top part as an example of ika
hiku.
In order to change 648 (the
estimated number of glyphs on side a of H) into 666 it is only
necessary to calculate how many glyphs there could have been in line
Ha12 if the wood had been intact:
Earlier, when I
estimated the number of glyphs on side a to be 648, I had considered only
how those
glyph lines with a gap in the glyph flow should be counted. But in line Ha12 no
glyphs arrive beyond the destroyed surface:
a1 |
50 |
50 |
burnt
area could have contained the number of glyphs below |
50 |
b1 |
*51 (?) |
51 |
a2 |
58 |
108 |
108 |
b2 |
48 |
99 |
a3 |
52 |
160 |
160 |
b3 |
47 |
146 |
a4 |
56 |
216 |
216 |
b4 |
51 |
197 |
a5 |
59 |
275 |
275 |
b5 |
57 |
254 |
a6 |
64 |
339 |
*5 |
344 |
b6 |
54 |
308 |
a7 |
48 |
387 |
*3 |
395 |
b7 |
50 |
358 |
a8 |
46 |
433 |
*8 |
449 |
b8 |
*54 (?) |
412 |
a9 |
40 |
473 |
*13 |
502 |
b9 |
65 |
477 |
a10 |
49 |
522 |
*18 |
569 |
b10 |
67 |
544 |
a11 |
36 |
558 |
*22 |
627 |
b11 |
53 |
597 |
a12 |
*21 (?) |
579 |
*18 (?) |
666 |
b12 |
*51 (?) |
648 |
sum |
*666 (?) |
sum |
*648 (?) |
Adding an
estimated number of 18 glyphs changes 648 into 666. But 18 is purely
a guess. The parallels in P and Q have different numbers of
glyphs:
Yet, 19 in P is close to 18, while the short Q text must be
considered as a less likely candidate to rely on.
Furthermore, 18 in the absent space can suggest half 36, which
would fit nicely with 666 + 648 = 1314, because 13 * 14 = 182.
Both 182 and 180 are measures for half a year.
It must also be mentioned that probably the surface
destroyed by fire was there in front of the eyes of whoever
incised the glyphs, so much can be ascertained by considering
which portions of the text he assigned to the blackened area.
These portions are not random but - which can be seen from the
parallel Q and P texts - were 'left in the dark' because the
events told of were of a 'dark character'.
And we cannot
neglect the sum 579 + 648 = 1227 (which refers to those glyphs
which - according to my estimates - once indeed were visible on
the tablet). If we divide by 3 the result is recognizable:
1227 / 3 = 409
|