 |
 |
 |
- |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ab2-68 |
Ab2-69 |
Ab2-70 |
|
Ab2-71 |
Ab2-72 |
Ab2-73 |
| no te tagata
huki hia |
ko te
manu |
ui
maitaki |
|
e
manu gao takoa |
e
manu gao riuriu |
e
manu maś te maro |
 |
- |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Ha8-105 |
|
Ha8-106 |
Ha8-107 |
Ha8-108 |
Ha8-109 |
Ha8-110 |
Ha8-111 |
Ha8-112 |
 |
- |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Pa8-9 |
|
Pa8-10 |
Pa8-11 |
Pa8-12 |
Pa8-13 |
Pa8-14 |
Pa8-15 |
 |
- |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Qa8-16 |
|
Qa8-17 |
Qa8-18 |
Qa8-19 |
Qa8-20 |
Qa8-21 |
Qa8-22 |
Qa8-23 |
For the inexperienced eye the similarities between these
sequences - from four different tablets (the three tablets H, P and
Q having the 'same' text throughout, not only what is shown here
because of the parallels with Tahua) - is far from obvious. But I am
certain. That does not mean, however, that I believe that parallel
texts should be read exactly the same, they only cover the same 'events'.
Example: The glyph Ab2-69 does have counterparts in the other three
tablets, but the counterparts are located after 'maitaki' instead of before. The
parallels continue on next page.
|