With Poike equal to summer, the rest of the island ought to be reflected in the text of G with more glyphs than summer.
The season of rising
sun presumably is defined by the 1st and 10th of the 'staffs for
pushing sky up', Ga4-3 and
Ga6-13, together measuring out a span of 68 days (one glyph for each
day). The following 26 days (up to the
last one of the 31 kiore - henua glyphs) apparently must have
another meaning:
|
66 |
|
25 |
|
Ga4-3 |
Ga6-13 |
Ga7-10 |
68
↑ |
26 |
When Ure Honu lifted up the house (hare paega) of
Tuu Ko Ihu searching for the stolen skull of king Hotu
Matua, it probably illustrates how in spring the 'sky roof'
is raised up and light comes in from the outside. A hare
paega is formed like an overturned boat, similar to the
hemisphere of the sky.
Ure Honu
certainly did not raise the canoe-formed house higher than
necessary, and certainly not by 90º, because that would have
made
the house roll over.
68º could have been his choice. The number of days for a regular
sun year was anciently often chosen
as 360 and the measure of degrees chosen so as to agree, i.e.
with 360º for a complete circle. Though I think the
ancient Chinese used 365¼º for a full circle.
|
The ancient Chinese were civilized early and they may have thought of extracalendrical days - outside the rule of the sovereign - as an insult.
When Ure Honu
lowered the house again, it must be another movement by (for
instance) 68º,
parallel with how sun
would be sinking down in the second half of summer. 68 + 68 = 136 =
180 - 44. If this guess is correct, we can expect high summer to
have a duration of 44 days.
Given that the last
glyph of summer is number 180, there should be 44 - 26 = 18 glyphs
more 'high summer glyphs' beyond Ga7-10. But, we have recently
guessed the part of the text involving summer to be not 180 but 206 glyphs:
|
It then becomes
easy to imagine how sun declines beginning at Ga8-21
and ending at Gb3-1:
|
I have gradually come to believe honu (hônu, hoonu) basically is the same word as henua. The Hawaiian honua is the equivalent of Easter Island henua. Or there is a wordplay between the expression for turtle - with its back rising up over the surface of the sea - and the island surrounded on all sides by water and having the same shape.
On the other hand, I tend to think of henua as he nua, the old woman (nuahine).
In Mayan thought the turtle is expressing 'beginning'. It all begins when the island is rising up over the surface of the sea by great forces. In the sky new stars are born below the belt of Orion.
We could even call the high summer season (44 days in the model)
Poike. But Hanga Takaure and Hanga Hoonu cannot
reasonably stretch for 68 days each. Instead, Hanga Takaure
should have 2 glyphs and Hanga Hoonu 1 glyph (1 for the end
of first half of the year and 2 for the end of the second half):
Here we can clearly see that also Gb3-1 is a takaure
glyph. Shouldn't it be a honu glyph? The question is
poignant and needs an answer. The lack of an answer mars the
model.
Instead of throwing
the model away - the method of stringent western hard science -
it should be studied further. The model is valuable because it
is not just a guess, it is a structured guess. Consequences can
be inferred, and if they are absurd then the model must be
discarded. If they are not, the model will gain in credibility.
The lack of an
answer is no reason to throw away a model. Not even the best of
theories can predict or explain everything.
|
The model predicts there should be 68 glyphs before the start of
summer and another group of 68 glyphs beyond the end of summer. Sun
will rise also during 68 days ending at Hanga Takaure
(because from winter solstice to spring equinox sun will steadily
advance higher in the sky). Likewise sun will continue to decline
even after autumn equinox:
|
Gb3-3 is a most peculiar type of glyph, which does not fit in my
system for catalogizing glyphs, but it has a comrade in Gb3-6:
|
Even if haga belong to the sea, they presumably should be counted as honu, because it would be numerically sound and it would strengthen the model. 68 would be changed into 70 (a better number than the inexplicable 68). 70 is obviously 7 * 10, a mixture of moon (7 for the days of the week) and sun (the fingers, 'fire', are no more than 10):
|
|
68 |
|
68 |
|
|
68 |
|
Ga4-1 |
Ga4-2 |
Ga6-14 |
Ga8-20 |
Ga8-21 |
Gb3-3 |
70
↑ |
70
→ |
70
↓ |
Manu rere in Ga6-14 and Ga8-20 are signs of 'high'.
65 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
Gb5-6 |
Gb5-10 |
Gb5-11 |
Gb5-12 |
360 |
364 |
365 |
366 |
70
↓ |
2 |
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
Ga1-13 |
Ga1-14 |
Ga1-15 |
Ga1-16 |
Ga1-17 |
Ga1-18 |
70
↑ |
210 (honu) + 2 * 70 = 350. With 3 * 70 in honu, there ought to be at least 3 also in takaure, thereby reaching 6 for the sun. But time is measured by the moon and therefore an even better number would be 7 for the moon. 471 - 210 = 261 (= 9 * 29) is though not enough to add more than one further 70-day period.
'Night' should be cut in two parts, and maybe we should interpret 119 as 60 + 59 (or as 59 + 60). No, that is not possible, because one of the components should be 70.
Gb5-11--12 evidently together express '2', meaning the 2nd part of the cycle is beginning. Gb5-10 is glyph number 364 from Gb8-30. The old expression 'year and a day' also says the year is finished with its 364th day.
The 'cut' in two of the 'night' comes after Gb5-10. The 'land of the fishes' certainly covers Ga1-13--Ga3-24, but it does not necessarily begins already with Gb5-11. The 'cut' (corresponding to the Mayan 'crack in the turtle shell' - north of the equator) could for example be 2 + 49 = 51 nights.
If so, then the missing 70-night period should end with Ga1-12:
|
56 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
Gb7-5 |
Gb8-30 |
Ga1-1 |
Ga1-11 |
Ga1-12 |
70
→ |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Gb5-11 |
Gb5-12 |
Gb5-13 |
Gb7-4 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
49 |
A fish (of sorts) in Gb5-13 and another in Gb7-5 indicates the deepest (extracalendrical) part of the cycle. From Gb5-7 a new cycle emerges, and Gb7-6 is the great henua glyph in G:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gb7-5 |
Gb7-6 |
Gb7-7 |
Gb7-8 |
Gb7-9 |
Gb7-10 |
Gb7-11 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
A final remark: The figure I have suggested as marking honu, standing close to the border between honu and takaure, could be the same figure as that in Ga1-16:
|
|
|
|
|
Gb3-2 |
Gb3-3 |
Gb3-4 |
Gb3-5 |
Gb3-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ga1-13 |
Ga1-14 |
Ga1-15 |
Ga1-16 |
Ga1-17 |
Ga1-18 |
Ga1-16 looks like a full moon with a honu person inside, while Gb3-5 could be illustrating its opposite, a takaure person on board the sun canoe.