Are there such? And are not all patterns perceived just perceptions, changing with the observer? We will see if this investigation leads us to an answer to that question. Let experience tell us if the search for number patterns (as expressed by numbers of glyphs in the Tahua glyph sequences) is meaningful or not.

I have made a table showing the results of one of the possible ways of aggregating these numbers. But there must be very many such ways of aggregating glyphs sequences, that we must remind ourselves of. The possible variations of more or less interesting sums of numbers are too many to be of any practical value whatsoever.

This, however, is a statement that is untrue as regards the sums 314 (= 100 * π) and 157 (= ½ * 100 * π). These two numbers occur as sums in other rongorongo texts (e.g. Keiti) in a way that certainly is determined by the writers (and not due to randomness). This pattern is not just due to the perception of the observer but 'objective'. We can make a primary table showing this: