These three glyphs I have transported from the end of 'a' (2a, 3a respectively 5a) to the beginning of 'b' (2b, 3b respectively 5b). A quick review of an earlier table make it clear that at that time I saw them as 'parallel in position', also with the two fishes discussed in the previous page. If structure is important and we have relocated the fishes, then those three above should follow suit. Given, of course, that I located them correctly in this earlier table. Which I don't know. The hyperlink 'next page' leads to a short discussion about 'Clara-knives' and their occurence at the beginning of a sequence of glyphs. Possibly this tendency may be seen in the three glyphs above. However, in support of the relocation from 5a to 5b the backwards oriented glyph Hb5-46:
affirms that in Hb5-47 a new sequence of glyphs is starting. Or? No, that is not a valid argument. Because there are a lot of backwards looking sitting persons, with no suggestion that something is ending. |
