There is no example in Tahua of this unusual glyph type. A hyperlink is inserted to GD19:
The 'spines' on the back are similar.
Aruku Kurenga (B) Only Bb1-11 appears to be related to the 'prototype' for GD82:
Mamari (C) Ca13-14 is the only possible candidate for belonging to GD81:
Hadn't there been so very few examples of GD81 anywhere among the rongorongo texts, though, I would not have included the glyph, not even as a borderline case.
Échancrée (D) No glyphs are found.
Keiti (E) No glyphs are found.
The rest of the texts The texts above have been used as a kind of 'test ground' to see if the definitions could be used. For the rest of the texts the same principles have been used, although less stringently. The experiences gained have been relied upon rather than what is written above about what characterizes the glyph type. There may be a few extra glyph added, which would not have been so with a strict application of the written definitions. On the other hand there has been no attempt to ignore glyphs which according to the written definitions ought to belong to the glyph type. |
