The oval in GD75 must have a double border. Ovals with a single border are found in GD86. The 'bulge' is not necessary. Examples: Ab4-51, Aa8-75, Aa2-3 and Ab3-76:
The 'bulge' may be oriented differently, Aa8-42, Aa6-63, Ab6-49 and Ab2-42:
A hyperlink leads to GD19 because there we find e.g. Aa4-14 and Ab1-15:
Another link leads to GD24, where glyphs with double ovals appear, as in Aa5-12, Ab2-13 and Ab7-31:
Aruku Kurenga (B) Ba5-37--38 have a trinagular outline:
Mamari (C) Holes in GD28 may allude to GD74 and an example is Ca9-15:
Among the Mamari glyphs I found 'eyes' which possibly indicate GD75 and I decided to include them (Cb4-13--15, Cb10-4--8 respectively Cb11-12-13):
Three marginal cases which I hesitated about, but in the end decided to include are Ca9-17 (GD17), C13-14 (18) and Cb3-22 (GD11+GD37):
So far I have not found any other GD11 bird with a double-rim oval attached to the wing.
Échancrée (D) Da2-111 is unusual, yet resembles Cb10-8:
Keiti (E) Eb7-14 is an interesting combination with GD88:
The rest of the texts The texts above have been used as a kind of 'test ground' to see if the definitions could be used. For the rest of the texts the same principles have been used, although less stringently. The experiences gained have been relied upon rather than what is written above about what characterizes the glyph type. There may be a few extra glyph added, which would not have been so with a strict application of the written definitions. On the other hand there has been no attempt to ignore glyphs which according to the written definitions ought to belong to the glyph type. |
