GD44 glyphs are similar to GD36, as seen e.g. in the top sign of Aa1-20:
Therefore a hyperlink is inserted from GD44 to GD36. Another hyperlink goes from GD44 to GD45. Ab2-69 is an example which explains the need:
The upraised wing maybe alludes to GD44, but it could equally well allude to GD45, exemplified by Aa1-51:
Aa7-50, on the other hand is included in GD44 (but also in GD36 due to uncertainty):
Aa5-58 and similar glyphs are not included in GD36 but only in GD44 (and GD12 of course):
As there are hyperlinks both to and from GD36 it is not important whether the glyphs are located there or at GD44. Figures which look as if they were on a boat have been located at GD44 but not at GD36, e.g. Ab6-14 (GD42), Ab1-15 (GD19) and Ab1-2 (GD41)
The type of combination exemplified by Aa7-70:
is not seen under GD44. A hyperlink is instead inserted from GD44 to GD22. The 'horns' protruding like the ends of moon sickles in GD22, e.g. in Aa8-1, also motivates the hyperlink:
A few combined glyphs with unclear signs, possibly alluding to GD44 and therefore included here, are Aa1-79 (GD11), Aa4-14 (GD19), Aa8-40 (GD56) and Aa8-82, -85:
Aruku Kurenga (B) Hatchmarked GD44 appear, e.g. Bb9-44:
Examples with GD44 as a boat are seen in for instance Ba1-23, Ba7-20 and Bb10-33:
Curious variants of this theme probably also appear, as in Ba1-47, Ba8-6 and Bb6-15:
Bb11-42, Bb7-12 and Ba8-38 seem to belong together:
A special case is Bb11-15, which forced me to also accept Bb7-41:
Mamari (C) A form like an extra moon sickle at the top is seen in Ca5-32:
(GD22 glyphs are otherwise not included here.) Marginal cases, yet accepted as GD44, are Ca2-25 and Ca5-9:
Also included are these exceptions at the beginning of side a (Ca1-1, Ca1-13 and Ca1-21):
One more exception is Cb12-7, where the GD44 sign is so evident behind the arm:
Ca12-22 is included because of the presumable connection with Cb2-6:
A moon sickle depicted as a fish tail apperas in this type of glyph (Ca8-7):
Unique is Ca7-27:
Échancrée (D) Da3-102 and Da4-111 are notable:
Keiti (E) Eb3-10 is interesting, with GD44 evidently as the part at right, and then the right part of Eb6-14 also seems to incorporate GD44:
The rest of the texts The texts above have been used as a kind of 'test ground' to see if the definitions could be used. For the rest of the texts the same principles have been used, although less stringently. The experiences gained have been relied upon rather than what is written above about what characterizes the glyph type. There may be a few extra glyph added, which would not have been so with a strict application of the written definitions. On the other hand there has been no attempt to ignore glyphs which according to the written definitions ought to belong to the glyph type. |
