GD37 is very frequent among the glyphs. Therefore restrictions must rule when allowing glyphs to be classified as GD37.
The strict rule implies that some glyph types with GD37 as a more or less obligatory part must stay outside, examples are Ab7-31 (GD24), Ab4-12 (GD25), Aa6-23 (GD66) and Ab2-36 (GD76):
There is a variant of GD37, seen in e.g. Aa2-66 and Aa2-46:
Not only are the short ends 'sucked in', but the long sides are at their ends extended. This has made me accept the unusual Aa2-9 as GD37:
Strangely shaped examples of GD37 are Aa4-17, Ab4-42 and Ab4-7:
No more need to be said about the glyphs in GD37, because the strict rule allows only clear examples.
Aruku Kurenga (B) In Bb6-2 we can see an unusual example of short ends 'sucked in':
Another notable glyph is Bb6-13:
Mamari (C) Ca2-21 is somewhat similar to Aa2-9 (see earlier above):
Both glyphs are also registered as GD24. A few other curious glyphs are Cb11-15, Cb5-3 and Ca12-10:
Échancrée (D) Db2-106 is an exception to the strict rule which limits the number of glyphs classified as GD37:
Keiti (E) Interesting are Eb1-41 and Eb6-1:
The rest of the texts The texts above have been used as a kind of 'test ground' to see if the definitions could be used. For the rest of the texts the same principles have been used, although less stringently. The experiences gained have been relied upon rather than what is written above about what characterizes the glyph type. There may be a few extra glyph added, which would not have been so with a strict application of the written definitions. On the other hand there has been no attempt to ignore glyphs which according to the written definitions ought to belong to the glyph type. |