This fish type has head up and a straight tail, not bent as in GD62:
Fins are seen on one or both sides, whereas the fishes in GD38 have no fins on their sides:
GD27 may have fins converted into arms and legs, e.g. as in Ab2-50:
Or fins may be converted into other members (Ab2-63 and Aa7-29):
Aruku Kurenga (B) Bb4-34--35 possibly are free from other signs (than the 'feather string' in Bb4-34):
Ba10-2 and Bb2-13, on the other hand, have various signs on them:
Even more clearly are Ba6-3 and Bb2-1 'infested' by signs:
Ba4-12 is fundamentally a variant of GD65, but it looks as if an allusion is made to GD27:
Mamari (C) No GD27 signs.
Échancrée (D) The peculiar mouths of Da7-107 and Da7-113 maybe indicates that Db3-108 alludes to GD27:
Keiti (E) Ea1-4 has a shape somewhat resembling Ab3-35:
Ea1-17 has a 'mouth':
The rest of the texts The texts above have been used as a kind of 'test ground' to see if the definitions could be used. For the rest of the texts the same principles have been used, although less stringently. The experiences gained have been relied upon rather than what is written above about what characterizes the glyph type. There may be a few extra glyph added, which would not have been so with a strict application of the written definitions. On the other hand there has been no attempt to ignore glyphs which according to the written definitions ought to belong to the glyph type. |