next page

table of contents home

1. The current star at the north pole is Polaris and we have found a suitable glyph in Gb7-25:

Gb6-26 Gb6-27 Gb6-28 (*2)
(0h) Caph, Sirrah (408.5) Algenib Pegasi (409.8)
'March 21 '22 '23 (82)
23
Gb7-24 Gb7-25 (436) Gb7-26 (*28)
   Polaris (434.6), Baten Kaitos (434.6), Metallah (434.9), Segin (435.2), Mesarthim (435.2), Sheratan (435.4)
23 'April 16 (106) '17 '18 (108)
34 184
Gb8-30 Gb8-30 (*64) Ga7-16 (*249)
Hyadum I (471.4) Hyadum II (472.2) Antares (249.1)
34 'May 23 (143)  '24 184 'November 25 (329)

The position for Polaris above (which has been adjusted downwards with 1 day due to the precession) is equal to 26.6 days beyond March 21. 107 (April 17) - 80 = *27.

From this we can deduce that 0h must be at Rogo in Gb6-26. There will be 63 days from there to the end of side b (not 64 as I earlier thought).

I have allowed Polaris and the 5 other stars close by to spread out over 3 glyphs because we have concluded the precision in principle cannot be greater:

... The position of a star in the text is presumably defined not by a single glyph but by a triplet of glyps, because there must be borderline cases where it is difficult to know if a star is at the end of a day or if it is at the beginning of next day ... A pair of glyphs is necessary.

But with a pair of glyphs for each star there are still borderline cases, viz. those where a star was measured to be e.g. in position 436.0 - should it pair up with Gb7-24 or with Gb7-26? Only with a triplet of glyphs for each star can an orderly system be possible.

In order to measure out 329 (November 25) - 107 (April 17) = 222 days from Gb7-25 (Polaris) to Ga7-16 (Antares) it is necessary to count puo in Gb8-30 twice. This is the only instance so far when I have given a glyph 2 dates.

"The species name dactylifera 'date-bearing' comes from Ancient Greek dáktulos 'date' (also 'finger') and the stem of the Latin verb ferō 'I bear'." (Wikipedia)