3. We must remember there is another
viri in Ga5-11, drawn exactly like that in
Ga7-1,
presumably hinting that the day beyond autumn
equinox (north of the equator) for some reason is equivalent to the
day beyond November 10 (where
'the dish is broken'):
 |
 |
|
Ga5-8 |
Ga5-9 |
| ο
Virginis (183.1) |
Alchita, Ma Wei
(184.1) |
|
September 20 |
21 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ga5-10 (121) |
Ga5-11 (*186) |
Ga5-12 |
Ga5-13 |
Ga5-14 |
|
Minkar (184.7), ρ
Centauri (184.9) |
Pálida (185.6),
Megrez (185.9), Gienah (186.1), 6 Com. Ber., ε Muscae (186.2) |
Zaniah (186.8), Chang Sha (187.3) |
Intrometida (188.4) |
Acrux
(188.5), γ Com. Berenicis (189.0), σ Centauri (189.1) |
|
September 22 |
23
(266) |
24 |
25 |
26 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ga5-15 |
Ga5-16 (**99) |
Ga5-17 (*192) |
Ga5-18 |
|
Algorab (189.5), Gacrux
(189.7), γ Muscae (190.0), Avis Satyra (190.3) |
Asterion (190.5), Kraz
(190.7), α Muscae (191.2) |
χ
Virginis (191.7), ρ Virginis (192.4) |
Porrima, γ Centauri (192.5) |
|
27 (270) |
28 |
29 |
30 |
171 (Ga7-1) - 122
(Ga5-11) = 49 (= 7 weeks).
235 (Gb1-5) - 49 =
186.
364 + 49 = 413 = 14
* 29˝.
Does it mean the
glyphs from viri in Ga5-11 to viri in Ga7-1 are to be counted
only when measuring time by Moon, that we should jump from September 22 at
Ga5-10 to September 23 at Ga7-1?
But this would
necessitate also shifting the places for the stars 49 glyphs forward, for
instance:
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ga7-1
(171) |
Ga7-2 |
Ga7-3
(*237) |
Ga7-4 |
|
Pálida (185.6), Megrez (185.9), Gienah (186.1), 6 Com. Ber., ε
Muscae (186.2) |
Zaniah (186.8), Chang Sha (187.3) |
Intrometida (188.4) |
Acrux
(188.5), γ Com. Berenicis (189.0), σ Centauri (189.1) |
|
September 23 (266) |
24 |
25 |
26 |
Such an adjustment would be hard to combine with
my assumption of where in the text the heliacal risings of Aldebaran and Antares
are located:
|
