There could be similarities in the stars - with the beginning of the text on side a at heliacal ε Arietis and also, at midnight, the culmination of Denebola - possible to compare with the phenomena at Gb4-24:
And this should make us look anew at the end of side b (possibly comparable to Gb4-18 etc):
|
|
|
Gb4-18 (109) |
Gb4-19 |
Gb4-20 |
Februarius 22 (53) |
Terminalia |
Bissextum (420) |
no star listed (37) |
ν Arietis (38.5) |
μ Arietis (39.4), Head of the Fly (39.6), Kaffaljidhma (39.8) |
April 27 |
28 |
29 (119) |
|
|
|
119 |
Gb4-21 (112) |
Gb4-22 (342) |
Gb4-23 |
Februarius 25 |
26 (57) |
27 (423) |
ο Arietis (40.0), Angetenar (40.2), Right Wing (40.9) |
Bharani-2 / Stomach-17 |
no star listed (42) |
π Arietis (41.2), BHARANI (41.4), τ² Eridan, σ Arietis (41.7) |
April 30 |
May 1 (121) |
2 (122 = 58 + 64) |
|
|
|
|
Gb8-22 (463) |
Gb8-23 |
Gb8-24 (236) |
Gb8-25 |
JUNE 27 (58 + 120) |
28 |
29 (180) |
30 |
no star listed (34) |
ξ Arietis (35.0) |
no star listed (36) |
no star listed (37) |
April 24 |
25 |
26 (116 = 180 - 64) |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Gb8-26 |
Gb8-27 |
Gb8-28 (240) |
Gb8-29 |
Gb8-30 (471) |
JULY 1 (182) |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
ν Arietis (38.5) |
μ Arietis (39.4), Head of the Fly (39.6), Kaffaljidhma (39.8) |
ο Arietis (40.0), Angetenar (40.2), Right Wing (40.9) |
Bharani-2 / Stomach-17 |
no star listed (42) |
π Arietis (41.2), BHARANI (41.4), τ² Eridan, σ Arietis (41.7) |
April 28 (118) |
29 |
30 |
May 1 |
2 (122 = 186 - 64) |
Notably May 15 (135) becomes May 15 (500) when counting from January 1 in the previous year.
A great ragi at Gb4-32 (where 4 * 32 = 128) could perhaps be associated with Algenib Persei, where once upon a time the northern spring light would have returned after the decapitation of the medusa star Algol:
At Ga1-6 a similar ragi has been drawn in front:
|
124 |
|
Gb4-32 (123) |
Ga1-6 (248) |
March 7 (66) |
JULY 12 (193) |
Algenib Persei (50.0), ο Tauri (50.2), ξ Tauri (50.8) Gienah
|
τ Arietis (49.7) |
May 10 (130) |
May 9 (129) |
248 = 124 + 124 = 8 * 31.
JULY 12 (193) - March 7 (66) = 127 = 125 + 2. A back side reading continuing this far gives questionable results and we can probably rule out a back side reading of the text up to Ga1-6. Instead it is more probable we should read the beginning of the front side at the end of side b.
|