next page table of contents home

2. Auriga has been briefly discussed earlier, first in connection with Hassaleh (ι Aurigae) and then also at Hamal (α Arietis):

... Strassmeier and Epping, in their Astronomisches aus Babylon, say that there its stars formed the third of the twenty-eight ecliptic constellations, - Arku-sha-rishu-ku, literally the Back of the Head of Ku, - which had been established along that great circle milleniums before our era; and Lenormant quotes, as an individual title from cuneiform inscriptions, Dil-kar, the Proclaimer of Dawn, that Jensen reads As-kar, and others Dil-gan, the Messenger of Light.

George Smith inferred from the tablets that it might be the Star of the Flocks; while other Euphratean names have been Lu-lim, or Lu-nit, the Ram's Eye; and Si-mal or Si-mul, the Horn star, which came down even to late astrology as the Ram's Horn.

It also was Anuv, and had its constellation's titles I-ku and I-ku-u, - by abbreviation Ku, - the Prince, or the Leading One, the Ram that led the heavenly flock, some of íts titles at a different date being applied to Capella of Auriga.

Before the era when I-ku (the Leading One) was defined by the rise of Hamal, the Ram, there may have been an era when the star who led 'the heavenly flock' was Capella (α Aurigae), the Goat.

Brown associates it with Aloros, the first of the ten mythical kings of Akkad anterior to the Deluge, the duration of whose reigns proportionately coincided with the distances apart of the ten chief ecliptic stars beginning with Hamal, and he deduces from this kingly title the Assyrian Ailuv, and hence the Hebrew Ayil; the other stars corresponding to the other mythical kings being Alcyone, Aldebaran, Pollux, Regulus, Spica, Antares, Algenib, Deneb Algedi, and Scheat ...

The Sumerian Alulim somewhat resembles the Assyrian Ailuv, and I also imagine there is a resemblance between Hebrew Ayil and our name for the first month beyond spring equinox, April. In Camp 8 were exhibited four king lists and the first 'king' on these lists may have been Capella:

Sumerian W-B. 144

1 Alulim 28,800
2 Alagar 36,000
3 Enmenluanna 43,200
4 Eumengalanna 28,800
5 Divine Dumuzi 36,000
6 Ensibzianna 28,800
7 Enmenduranna 21,000
8 Ubardudu 18,600
9 -
10 -

Sum

241,200

Sumerian W-B. 62

1 Alulim 67,200
2 Alagar 72,000
3 Kidunnushakinkin 72,000
4 ... ? 21,600
5. Divine Dumuzi 28,800
6 Enmenluanna 21,600
7 Enzibzianna 36,000
8 Eumenduranna 72,000
9 Arad-gin 28,800*
10 Ziusudra 36,000

Sum

456,000

Berossos

1 Aloros 36,000
2 Alaparos 10,800
3 Amelon 46,800
4 Ammenon 43,200
5 Megalaros 64,800
6 Daonos 36,000
7 Euedoraches 64,800
8 Amempsinos 36,000
9 Opartes 28,800
10 Xisuthros 64,800

Sum

432,000

The Bible (King James' verison)

1 Adam 130
2 Seth 105
3 Enoch 90
4 Kenan 70
5 Mahalel 65
6 Jared 162
7 Enoch 65
8 Methuselah 187
9 Lamech 182
10 Noah: until Flood 600

Sum

1,656

* Campbell has 28,000 here, which, however, does not agree with the sum 456,000.

The key numbers for I-ku could possibly have been based on 24 (= ˝ * 48 = ⅓ * 72):

288

12 * 24

672

28 * 24

360

15 * 24

130

5 * 24 + 10

Another possibility is e.g. 6 (= 48 / 8 = 72 / 12):

288

6 * 48

672

6 * 112

360

6 * 60

130

6 * 21 + 4

112 could here refer to 472 - 360.