We should start from the beginning of glyph line Ha10 - because glyph lines apparently are significant - but even better is to find out what the end of line Ha9 might tell us. I have below used as number of glyphs (counted from Ha1-1) the sum of those which are visible and those which ought to have been there in the burnt areas of the tablet (cfr at hahe):


*Ha9-29	*Ha9-30	*Ha9-31 (480)	*Ha9-32	*Ha9-33	*Ha9-34
480 / 3 = 160			161

*Ha9-35	*Ha9-36	*Ha9-37	*Ha9-38	*Ha9-39	*Ha9-40
162			163

*Ha9-41	*Ha9-42	*Ha9-43 (492)
164

Henua ora in *Ha9-31 has glyph number 480 = 20 * 24, which presumably is significant. Day number 160 is equal to twice 80, the day number at Ha5-24, and 20 * 24 is 15 more multiples of 24 than 5 * 24.

For the following manu rere we can count 9 * 32 = 288 = 2 * 144 = 8 * 36 = 16 * 18. In G day number 288 is at manu rere in Ga8-20 (where 224 + 64 = 288), and also here we can count to 160 (this time by way of 8 * 20):


Ga8-16	Ga8-17	Ga8-18	Ga8-19	Ga8-20 (224)

Ga8-21	Ga8-22	Ga8-23	Ga8-24	Ga8-25

Ga8-26	Gb1-1 (231)	Gb1-2	Gb1-3	Gb1-4

At hahe it was noticed that manu rere with uplifted wing in Ga8-20 apparently corresponds to the pair *Ha11-30--31:


Ga8-20 (224)	Qb2-13	Qb2-14 (452)	*Ha11-30	*Ha11-31 (600)
288 = 224 + 64	290 = 452 / 2 + 64		600 / 2 = 300

But we should divide the number of glyph by 3 in the H text. 600 / 3 + 64 = 264 and 600 / 3 + 59 = 259. The latter alternative might be the correct way to count, because 259 - 160 = 99 (and 99 * 29½ is very close to 8 * 365 days = 5 Venus cycles):

...	...
*Ha11-26	*Ha11-27	*Ha11-28	*Ha11-29	*Ha11-30	*Ha11-31 (600)
258			600 / 3 + 59 = 259 = 160 + 99

*Ha11-32	*Ha11-33	*Ha11-34	*Ha11-35	*Ha11-36	*Ha11-37
260			261

Ika hiku in *Ha11-32 has a 'leg' sign at top left which presumably has the same meaning as in pare in *Qa2-40:


*Ha11-32 (601)	*Qa2-40 (63)

And 260 for the day number at *Ha11-32 is not far from that at Ga7-27:

	258
Gb6-26 (1)	258	Ga7-26 (260)	Ga7-27

7 * 26 (cfr Rogo in Ga7-26) = 182, and if we add 59 it becomes 241 ('one more' than 240). If we add 59 to 64 / 2 (at *Qa2-40) it becomes 91, which could refer to the end of the 1st quarter of the year. But with 91 equal to 90 + 1 it will also carry the meaning of a new beginning. The Mermaid's Purse (ika hiku) is the egg case of a shark, and 601 = 600 + 1 and 261 = 260 + 1.

I have identified ua in *Ha9-43 as the last glyph in a sequence not only because of its day number (= 364 - 200) but also - and foremost - because of the following maitaki glyph:


*Ha9-44	*Ha9-45	*Ha9-46	*Ha9-47	*Ha9-48	*Ha9-49
165			166

*Ha9-50	*Ha9-51 (500)	*Ha9-52	*Ha9-53	Ha10-1	Ha10-2
167			168

Because I had noticed that the glyph which follows upon Ha5-24 is also a maitaki glyph:


Ha5-19	Ha5-20 (236)	Ha5-21	Ha5-22	Ha5-23	Ha5-24 (240)	Ha5-25

Day number 168 for the beginning of line Ha10 should be significant. For instance, there is a structure in E which is based on 168 (cfr at mauga):

	40			40
Eb3-8		Eb4-11	Eb4-12		Eb5-11
1		42	43		84
	40			40
Eb5-11		Eb6-17	Eb6-18		Eb3-8
84		125	126		167 (1)

The total number of glyphs in the calendar (167) is subdivided into 4 equally long sequences of glyphs if we use Eb3-8, the 'moon mauga' and the 4 central glyphs in the table above. 4 * 42 = 168, but Eb3-8 is counted twice ...

At viri number 168 was discovered to be present also in K. Its total number of glyphs, 192, can be perceived as divided into 24 + 168 (= 7 * 24), e.g. in this way:

9		73			73	...	9
	Ka2-10		Kb1-11	Kb1-12		*Kb5-11
	1		75	1		75
	150
168

And in G (cfr at ihe tau) number 168 is once again marking the end of a 'season of light':

28
	Ga6-24	Ga6-25	Ga6-26
	165	166	167

29
29	Ga6-27 (168)	Ga6-28	Ga6-29

In Mamari, though, number 168 is thought of as 6 * 28 (instead of 7 * 24) and in the calendar of the month it indicates the beginning of light (from Moon), not the end of light (from Sun):


Ca6-25	Ca6-26	Ca6-27	Ca6-28	Ca7-1
165	166	167	168	169