I have at an earlier stage in this work tried to reconstruct the original number of glyphs in H, and the asterisk (*) refers to this fact. Neither the ordinal numbers from Ha1-1 nor from the beginning of line a7 are absolutely certain:

*Ha7-35 (379) *Ha7-36 *Ha7-37 *Ha7-38 *Ha7-39
*Ha7-40 *Ha7-41 *Ha7-42 (386) *Ha7-43 *Ha7-44
*Ha7-45 *Ha7-46 *Ha7-47 (391) *Ha7-48 *Ha7-49
 
*Ha7-50 *Ha7-51
Ha8-1 Ha8-2 Ha8-3 Ha8-4 Ha8-5 (400)

Manu kake in Ha8-5 (probably not by coincidence located at 400, we can for instance count 8 * 5 = 40) is much the same as manu kake in Ga3-1:

Ha8-5 (400) Ga3-1 (61)