I
have at an earlier stage in this work tried to reconstruct the
original number of glyphs in H, and the asterisk (*) refers to this
fact. Neither the ordinal numbers from Ha1-1 nor from the
beginning of line a7 are absolutely certain:
|
|
|
|
|
*Ha7-35
(379) |
*Ha7-36 |
*Ha7-37 |
*Ha7-38 |
*Ha7-39 |
|
|
|
|
|
*Ha7-40 |
*Ha7-41 |
*Ha7-42
(386) |
*Ha7-43 |
*Ha7-44 |
|
|
|
|
|
*Ha7-45 |
*Ha7-46 |
*Ha7-47
(391) |
*Ha7-48 |
*Ha7-49 |
|
|
|
*Ha7-50 |
*Ha7-51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ha8-1 |
Ha8-2 |
Ha8-3 |
Ha8-4 |
Ha8-5 (400) |
Manu kake in Ha8-5 (probably not by coincidence located at 400,
we can for instance count 8 * 5 = 40) is much the same as manu
kake in Ga3-1:
|
|
Ha8-5 (400) |
Ga3-1 (61) |
|