|
Tahua
(A) |
Keiti
(E) |
Large Santiago (H) |
|
side a |
670 |
200π+42 |
side a |
326 |
100π+12 |
side a |
*648 |
200π+20 |
|
side b |
664 |
200π+36 |
side b |
302 |
100π-12 |
side b |
*648 |
200π+20 |
|
sum |
1334 |
400π+78 |
sum |
628 |
200π |
sum |
*1296 |
400π+40 |
The small Keiti tablet made it necessary to take only
half 400, and in G we should note a similar reduction:
|
Small Santiago
(G) |
|
side a |
229 |
75π
+ 6.5 |
|
side b |
242 |
75π
- 6.5 |
|
sum |
471 |
150π |
To evade the fraction 0.5 we should presumably multiply each
glyph by 2:
|
Small Santiago
(G) |
|
side a |
458 |
150π
+ 13 |
|
side b |
484 |
150π
- 13 |
|
sum |
942 |
300π |
This is an argument for renumbering the glyphs:
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ga7-22 (384) |
Ga7-23 |
Ga7-24 |
Ga7-25 |
Ga7-26 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Ga7-27 |
Ga7-28 |
Ga7-29 |
Ga7-30 (400) |
Ga7-31 |
13 * 29.5 = 383.5 comes immediately before Ga7-22 (if we count
from Gb8-30). Perhaps we should think about Roto Iri Are
when trying to read these glyphs. The resemblances between
Ga7-24--25 and Gb5-3--2 are striking:
|
Roto Iri
Are
13 * 29.5 = 383.5 |
 |
 |
 |
23 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Gb5-2 |
Gb5-3 |
Gb5-4 |
Gb5-28 |
Gb5-29
(383) |
Gb6-1
(384) |
Gb6-2 |
|
30 |