16
	Ea7-36	Ea7-37	Ea7-38	Ea7-39
	Ea8-1	Ea8-2	Ea8-3	Ea8-4
	Ea8-101	Ea8-102	Ea8-103	Ea8-104

Ea8-101 has an ordinal number which indicates there is a gap (according to Fischer) after Ea8-4. I have commented: 'there seems to be room for one glyph in the space between Ea8-4 and Ea8-101'.

The number of glyphs in the 16th period of the K calendar has been reconstructed by me to 13 glyphs. Why then not set the number of glyphs in the 16th period of E also as 13 glyphs?