Both Barthel
and Fischer indicate that there seems to be a destroyed
glyph at the end of the H text. Possibly it was a vae glyph.
But even
if there never was any glyph later than Hb12-49 (and
also if there was a glyph there but not a vae
glyph) the parallel glyph sequences together indicate
how Bb12-26 corresponds to the end of a common text. |