It is possible to deduce that Eb7-38 and Eb8-29 are connected, by way of looking at the intermediate glyphs and comparing with the texts of G and K:
 
Eb7-36 Eb7-37 Eb7-38 Eb7-39 Eb7-40 Eb7-41 Eb7-42
Eb8-1 Eb8-2 Eb8-3 Eb8-4 Eb8-5 Eb8-6
Eb8-7 Eb8-8 Eb8-9 Eb8-10 Eb8-11 Eb8-12 Eb8-13
 
We recognize the text at the beginning of K, for instance in Eb8-2 and Eb8-5 resembling the glyph type exemplified by e.g. Ka2-14 (the 2nd of some 8 similar glyphs). And Eb8-1 (the 1st glyph in a new text line) we can identify with Ka2-9--10 (also at a kind of beginning):
 
Ka2-5 Ka2-6 Ka2-7 Ka2-8 Ka2-9 Ka2-10 Ka2-14 Ka3-1
Eb7-39 Eb7-40 Eb7-41 Eb7-42 Eb8-1 Eb8-2 Eb8-6
Eb8-3--5 (see at right) evidently correspond to Ka2-11--22.
Eb8-3 Eb8-4 Eb8-5
 
As to the 4 tao glyphs in E, there presumably is a connection with an earlier text sequence in K (and G):
 
Eb8-6 and previous glyphs - see above.
Eb8-7 Eb8-8 Eb8-9
Ga1-19 Ga1-20 Ga1-21 Ga1-22 Ga1-23 Ga1-24
*Ka1-22 *Ka1-23 *Ka1-24 Ka2-1 Ka2-2 Ka2-3
Eb8-13 is a tara
Eb8-10 Eb8-11 Eb8-12
- - etc - see above
Ga1-25 Ga1-26
- -
Ka2-4 Ka2-5 Ka2-6

Notice how Ga1-19--21 probably correspond to Eb7-36--38 - the order between the text segments are not the same. Ga1-19 is not a tara, but close to it.